Nikkor-P·C 10.5cm f/2.5
Nippon Kogaku · Nikon S + LTM · 105mm · f/2.5 · 1953 · Sonnar
Also known as: Nikkor-P·C 10.5cm f/2.5 · Nikkor-P.C 10.5cm f/2.5 · Nikkor-P C 10.5cm f2.5 · Nikkor-P 10.5cm f/2.5 · Nikkor 105mm f/2.5 rangefinder · Nikkor-P·C 105mm f/2.5 · NIKKOR-P・C 10.5cm F2.5 · 10.5cm f2.5
Variants & identification
| Variant | Mount | Years | Serial ranges | Production |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon S | Nikon S | 1953 | — | ~22,000 (Rotoloni via 35mmc) — the volume S-mount tele; census figure, per-mount split not stated |
| Leica screw mount | LTM | 1956 | — | — |
How to tell them apart
Nikon S:
- Nikon S bayonet with its own focusing helicoid and rangefinder-coupling cam (Haw teardown)
- Chrome-and-black 'panda' finish only — unlike the older 8.5cm/13.5cm teles it never came all-chrome (Haw)
- Early barrels have two small lugs securing the hood; later barrels are smooth at the front (Haw — differences otherwise minor, treat as identical)
Leica screw mount:
- Leica thread mount; per Haw the only difference from the S version is the mount itself
- No 105mm frame lines on Leica bodies — Haw considers an external finder mandatory (Mendes de Almeida shot it using the 135mm lines)
- Leica screw mount: Census dates the LTM version '~1956' — approximate, hedge preserved.
Specifications
- Formula
- Sonnar
- Construction
- 5 elements / 3 groups
- Aperture range
- f/2.5
- Min. focus
- 1.2 m
- Filter
- 52 mm
- Years manufactured
- 1953
- Country
- Japan
What reviewers say
- Richard Haw (blog) — Sharp already at f/2.5 with bokeh he calls "exquisite" — to him among the best bokeh of any S-mount Nikkor — but wide-open vignetting of more than two stops is its biggest weakness; highly recommended, a must for Nikon RF shooters.
- José Mendes de Almeida (EMULSIVE) (blog) — Beautiful, solid and easy to focus if a little heavy; often filed as a collector's item, but he shoots the LTM version on a Leica M7 in the street with great results — much less expensive than the Leica equivalent.
- Haruo Sato (佐藤治夫) — Nikon's own 1001-Nights essay, Tale 45 (blog) — Wakimoto left spherical aberration slightly under-corrected for the sake of the background blur: good resolution and contrast wide open across all but the extreme edges, with rich tonality — a best-seller that split the era's popularity with the 8.5cm f/2, beloved by Ken Domon. via machine translation — corrections welcome
- Taku Hayashi (smart tutor) (blog) — A hidden gem with soft, characterful Sonnar rendering and beautiful bokeh — and because so many were made, clean examples cost far less than the celebrated 8.5cm f/2. via machine translation — corrections welcome
History
Zenji Wakimoto (脇本善司) computed the optics for the 10.5cm f/2.5 in 1949, but the lens took the slow road to market: production drawings were only finalized in the spring of 1953, and sources split on the launch — December 1953 per the Japanese Wikipedia, late summer 1954 in Nikon’s own account. It arrived to fill the awkward gap between the 8.5cm and 13.5cm Nikkors, and its slightly odd f/2.5 aperture was no accident: in an era when Nikon counted every fraction of a stop against its rivals, f/2.5 made this the fastest lens in the 100mm class at the time. The design is a classic Sonnar — five elements in three groups, with a thick cemented triplet buried in the rear — and Wakimoto made one deliberately “wrong” choice that defined its character: he left the spherical aberration slightly under-corrected, trading a hair of clinical bite for background blur that reviewers still reach for words like “exquisite” to describe.
The gamble paid off. The 10.5cm became a best-seller — by Nikon’s own account it split the era’s popularity evenly with the celebrated 8.5cm f/2 — favored by Ken Domon (土門拳) among other photographers, with production around 22,000 units (Rotoloni, via 35mmc) making it the volume telephoto of the S system. Today it sits in the shadow of the more glamorous 8.5cm f/2, and because it was made in such numbers, clean examples remain the affordable entry into Nikon rangefinder telephotos. A Leica screw-mount version followed around 1956, differing only in its mount; Richard Haw notes the barrel itself evolved once, from early examples with two small hood-securing lugs to a later smooth-fronted version, and that the lens only ever wore the “new” chrome-and-black panda scheme — it arrived too late for the all-chrome dress of the older teles.
Its real legacy, though, is longevity. When Nikon pivoted to the SLR, Wakimoto’s computation crossed over almost intact — the rear element was shaved by roughly a millimeter to clear the Nikon F’s mirror (Haw; Nikon’s essay cites the same 1.0mm reduction), and that was essentially that. The same 1949 Sonnar soldiered on in the F-mount 105mm f/2.5 until 1971, a run of about 17 years, when Yoshiyuki Shimizu’s (清水義之) Xenotar-type (Gauss-derived) redesign — drawn up in the winter of 1966 — finally replaced it from serial 407301. Few lens designs of any era can claim their optical formula outlived the camera system it was born into.
Example photos
More sample photos elsewhere
- count_basil's LTM 10.5cm f/2.5 samples on a Leica M9 (Flickr)
- Ashwin Rao's 10.5cm LTM portrait set (Flickr)
These photographers keep all rights to their work — enjoy it at the source.
Sample photo wanted — shot with a Nikkor-P·C 10.5cm f/2.5? We'd love to feature it (with credit).
Live listings
The listings collector hasn't run for this family yet — check back soon, or search the marketplaces directly meanwhile.